3 ms·
I think you have a valid point. I do, however, think sanctuary cities (which are so fuzzily defined legally...) create an incentive for illegal immigration. It
by fixxer 10y ago
I think you have a valid point.
I do, however, think sanctuary cities (which are so fuzzily defined legally...) create an incentive for illegal immigration. It sends a message that one need only get through the border to make it permanent. My family immigrated legally. They should too.
If states choose not to enforce federal law, I think they need to clearly establish a legal position as to why.
- lazyasciiart 10y agoThere is one, it's called the anti-commandeering doctrine (no idea what this site is but it covers the background) http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/12/28/states-dont-have-to-comply-the-anti-comandeering-doctrine/ http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/12/28/states-dont-have-...
- fixxer 10y agoThat also applies to abortion. Careful...
- lazyasciiart 10y agoAre you saying I should stop knowing things because it might lead somewhere you don't like?
- fixxer 10y agoHa, not at all! I'm pointing out that there are caveats and potential feedback effects. Has any state cited the 10th?