Misleading implies falsehood of some sort, but they're releasing the actual paperwork absent anything other than an introductory statement about the collection

Misleading implies falsehood of some sort, but they're releasing the actual paperwork absent anything other than an introductory statement about the collection of as a whole, which does not equate to "framing, analysis, or editorial content" in my mind. Negligence counts as wrong-doing to me. The leaks prove that the CIA has lost control of their malware cache. And on the positive side, it gives the affected parties the means to patch their code.