> Comey disputes that in the linked article. >> "We did not develop any evidence that the Trump campaign or the current RNC was successfully hacked." - Linked

> Comey disputes that in the linked article. >> "We did not develop any evidence that the Trump campaign or the current RNC was successfully hacked." - Linked Article Seems pretty contradictory to me. Maybe a previous admin's RNC or something, but not the current one... Honestly, these intelligence agencies are pretty clueless. They use the same tactics to identify malware sources that they use to thwart their own identification as a malware source. I wouldn't believe anything they say about the source of malware - or anything anyone says. It's far too easy to make it look like someone else did it - use their or nearby providers, use their malware or slightly modified versions of it, copy their strings, etc. It's pretty easy stuff to do if you've got a bit of assembly skill too. > By wide consensus those releases were timed in order to maximize the damage they did to Clinton. That is exactly the type of action you would expect from someone motivated by politics. Or you know, just someone motivated to make impactful leaks. Despite these emails not being in my political favor, I wouldn't have done anything differently in their shoes. Would you have? and if you would have, would you honestly say that your actions weren't politically motivated? I think _not_ releasing in this case or avoiding impact would have been more clearly politically motivated.