9 ms·
Okay. So for Chernobyl, you are talking about direct deaths. For coal, the important figure are the indirect deaths. I think I said enough.
by onli 10y ago
Okay. So for Chernobyl, you are talking about direct deaths. For coal, the important figure are the indirect deaths. I think I said enough.
- mpweiher 10y agoNope. I compare direct coal deaths (for example the coal mine explosion in China, >1000) with direct nuclear deaths (Chernobyl, 56) and indirect coal deaths with indirect nuclear deaths (that's where the 100K vs. 90 or 0.01 figure comes from). But it is true that you have said enough. More than enough, in fact, because it has all been devoid of any facts.
- dang 10y ago> But it is true that you have said enough. More than enough, in fact, because it has all been devoid of any facts. Please edit uncivil swipes out of your comments here. It makes them less substantive and is destructive of thoughtful conversation.