3 ms·
This is literally a case of someone performing a test because the community thought the concept couldn't happen (after some debate). That's pretty much exactly
by SomeStupidPoint 10y ago
This is literally a case of someone performing a test because the community thought the concept couldn't happen (after some debate).
That's pretty much exactly the opposite of dogmatic.
Let me ask you this, though: do you have a better idea of how to do science? Because it sounds like you're just whining science isn't perfect and modern science is hard/confusing.
- lngnmn 10y agoThe case of performing a computer simulation, or an empirical experiment?
- SomeStupidPoint 10y agoEmpirical experiment. Did you even read the article before ranting at the concept?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- lngnmn 10y agoHard is not a problem. Confused and socially constructed is. The scientific method is a process of reduction to the approximation the truth (of what is) by systematic elimination of nonsense, which is quite contrary to pseudo-scientific process of piling up speculative nonsense upon nonsense in order to gain a certain social status and funding, which is, by the way, is how theologians and "philosophers" of religion used to get their living.