>but it's not at stasi levels... yet... Totally agreed. This kind argument is almost always provided in exasperated language that invokes the No True Scotsman

>but it's not at stasi levels... yet... Totally agreed. This kind argument is almost always provided in exasperated language that invokes the No True Scotsman fallacy. Do we really need to wait until it 'x bad' before it's ok to say we have a problem? And if so, who gets to define 'x'?