3 ms·
> I do consider 3-6% damning. You do realise the gap is just the "unexplained by standard corrections" and not "% due to sexism" right? > Why bother commentin
by sheepmullet 10y ago
> I do consider 3-6% damning.
You do realise the gap is just the "unexplained by standard corrections" and not "% due to sexism" right?
> Why bother commenting if you don't care about the wage gap?
I care that you are using misleading statistics to push an agenda.
- throwaway91111 10y agoThe shitty part is the gap, not the explanation. Are you seriously defending a wage gap because you're skeptical about why it exists? That's why it exists. At no point did I state I thought the wage gap is entirely due to sexism. although, I do argue it is evident sexism; I believe that still requires argument on your part that it's clearly not.