3 ms·
The criteria was "reversibility", not societal acceptance. Also, "having children" is not "considered good" by society in 100% of cases. We'd never have Roe v
by shiven 10y ago
The criteria was "reversibility", not societal acceptance.
Also, "having children" is not "considered good" by society in 100% of cases. We'd never have Roe v Wade if that were the case. I think you are building a bit of a straw man there.
- foo101 10y agoI don't see how Roe v Wade contradicts the claim that "having children" is "considered good". Roe v Wade is about abortion, i.e. a situation that applies to unwanted pregnancy, something we are not discussing in this thread. When we say "having children", I thought it is understood that we are talking about planned/wanted pregnancy with planned parenthood.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]