4 ms·
Yeah, I really wanted to have unique subdomains for each user. The design will be improved. This is a very, very early release. I'm also not a great designer,
by alex-m 10y ago
Yeah, I really wanted to have unique subdomains for each user.
The design will be improved. This is a very, very early release. I'm also not a great designer, so hopefully I'll get some help there :)
The entire issues section will see a huge update in 2 days.
- jazoom 10y agoWhat's the actual benefit of a subdomain for each user?
- chris_overseas 10y agoHopefully "user" really means "company" rather than individual user. Otherwise copy/pasting URLs between colleagues won't be much fun.
- jazoom 10y agoI'm sure it does. But I still can't see the benefit of a subdomain rather than a subdirectory.
- daenney 10y agoIt could be easier for load balancing or if you want to shard. You could do it at the DNS level at that point, without needing to strip the TLS bits, decode the HTTP request and go from there. For the end user though I can't see much of a benefit of a subdomain over a URL path, or the other way around. I don't think it matters much but the author might have bigger plans in which having the subdomain could be easier.
- crackcomm 10y agoI hope it will be still as simple as it is now.