Agile is often cherry-picked and reduced to only the parts that people like. Burn-down charts are ubiquitous but sprint retrospectives are not. Then some other

Agile is often cherry-picked and reduced to only the parts that people like. Burn-down charts are ubiquitous but sprint retrospectives are not. Then some other parts are conveniently misinterpreted. People misunderstand the role of the scrum master and interpret it as the development team leader... confuse points with hours, or try to measure team performance using velocity... which is the same as measuring a truck driver performance by how much gas they're using rather than concrete results. Everyone claims to be doing scrum correctly, just like everyone claims to be doing git-flow correctly. It's not only cool to be agile and use scrum, it's more like a dogmatic cult where scrum is the ultimate truth that solves every problem in every case and cannot be criticized.