I am not leveling accusations at Linux foundation, I am just saying the name is not reflective of its interests and to clarify there is nothing wrong with its i

I am not leveling accusations at Linux foundation, I am just saying the name is not reflective of its interests and to clarify there is nothing wrong with its interests. Its just end users also need to organize to fund and promote open source. There is a perception these things are taken care of but they are not, most Linux groups are industry bodies. If Github benefits from Redis and its just one of hundreds of examples then there is a moral case to be made to support it and give back to open source in someway so the stream continues to flow. In this case Github had not even bothered to reach out to the Redis author, so there is something wrong here in how successful startups are engaging and using open source.