5 ms·
But the difference is most binary options is theft. Uber is a legitimate service with bad business practices.
by WhiteSource1 10y ago
But the difference is most binary options is theft. Uber is a legitimate service with bad business practices.
- lmm 10y agoLegitimate in what sense? Uber has been extensively breaking the law for pretty much its entire existence, no?
- mnarayan01 10y agoIn that they actually provide the service which they advertise and their customers desire.
- roel_v 10y agoSo does the pusher on the corner around my block, what's your point?
- uxp100 10y agoI think that binary options were a literal scam. The pusher sells real drugs.
- nilved 10y agoThat the law doesn't matter when it comes to business?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- greenhatman 10y agoThe point is that they provide customers with a service that they really want. Transport after Uber is a lot better than before. Companies like Uber NEED to exist. Luckily there is competition now. Uber's apparent bad work culture is an entirely separate point. And so are the laws they skirt. I think most of those laws should be scrapped anyway.
- eli_gottlieb 10y agoNot at a profit, they don't.
- metaphorm 10y agoyou're conflating fraud and evasion of regulations. these are not the same things. Uber evades regulations (and has a shitty office culture) but they don't defraud their customers.