Wow, the left are the new loony, tin foil hat conspiracy theorists. Sure, it was definitely a "vast right wing conspiracy" (Hillary's exact words) that threw u

Wow, the left are the new loony, tin foil hat conspiracy theorists. Sure, it was definitely a "vast right wing conspiracy" (Hillary's exact words) that threw up flags when she opened her first ever trading account with $1k, turned it into $1 million in less than a year with no experience, or understanding of the markets (she supposedly started trading futures on a tip from a friend) and then never did it again because it was stressful. I guess that same conspiracy group were trying to go after this irrelevant governor in Arkansas for the other scandals going on during his governorship. Then when Bill became president the scandals continued. People like you and Hillary want to claim this is some vast conspiracy by the republicans but the question any critical thinker has to ask themselves is why? Clinton was the most conservative president since Reagan [1]. Why on earth would the Republicans be out to get someone who's more conservative than most of their own presidential candidates? Like most conspiracy theories, it requires a great deal of faith in absence of evidence, motive or even logic. [1] https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/was-clinton-more-conservative-bush https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/was-clinton-mor...