3 ms·
Actually, no, now I don't. I despise ads for reasons not least of which is that they are a form of insidious psychological conditioning. I'd much rather have t
by FullMtlAlcoholc 10y ago
Actually, no, now I don't. I despise ads for reasons not least of which is that they are a form of insidious psychological conditioning.
I'd much rather have the predominant funding model be similar to services like patreon. Netflix has shown that you don't need ads, ads everywhere to produce quality media in this age, just as premium cable did in the past. I'd rather have a few channels or sites of quality than hundreds of pieces of crap
- SophosQ 10y agoIf such a model is to be protected from the dynamics of a free market economy (Higher demand driving prices higher) it requires significant government intervention, at the very least, analogous to the metro system in certain cities, to ensure that the different strata of society have access to it without breaking their backs. However, as with most non-essential consumables, the model is susceptible to privatisation whose motivation is often, solely the maximisation of profit. Perhaps a lobbying group analogous to the NRA could help counter such overtures for privatisation by the industry.
- thebaer 10y agoRight. The advertising-supported internet was good for a while, in my mind, only so that we could see just how bad it can be for the end user, and we can move on to better business models. > I'd rather have a few channels or sites of quality than hundreds of pieces of crap 100% agreed