4 ms·
Thats just what you're familiar with. I find it perfectly natural to read "if 5 == x:" without having to flip it around. (And it's not about "cognitive load"
by SomeStupidPoint 10y ago
Thats just what you're familiar with.
I find it perfectly natural to read "if 5 == x:" without having to flip it around.
(And it's not about "cognitive load" on the compiler, it's about fail to error not fail to silent success.)
- closed 10y agoAgreed. I think the key here is that consistent exposure over time to patterns reduces cognitive load through "chunking".