The problem is that there is still a syntax that's required to know. Look at AppleScript. It uses keywords that sound like easy English but knowing how to use

The problem is that there is still a syntax that's required to know. Look at AppleScript. It uses keywords that sound like easy English but knowing how to use AppleScript still takes a lot of reading. After reading the article about RUST, I have been thinking about how a compiler could take source code and write it back with fixes/suggestions right into the source so if you make a silly mistake, the compiler can just say "I think you meant..." and offer to fix it for you. In your language, it would be beneficial to avoid "Syntax error!" and implement something like "Did you mean...", or have synonyms like "says", "exclaims", "talks", etc that compile to the same thing but add flexibility (or the compiler automatically re-writes to the preferred syntax)