3 ms·
When dreaming up new ways to tax cars, please bear in mind that wear on roadways from vehicles is proportional to miles driven times per-axle weight to the four
by logfromblammo 10y ago
When dreaming up new ways to tax cars, please bear in mind that wear on roadways from vehicles is proportional to miles driven times per-axle weight to the fourth power.
A gas tax is already proportional to miles driven times vehicle weight times a fuel efficiency factor.
Congestion, on the other hand, is a more difficult thing. Vehicle length certainly plays a factor, as well as width, acceleration, and braking distance. Number of passengers is an obvious factor. Trip routing efficiency has a role. I really don't expect local legislators to understand the mathematics of traffic. If they don't commission a study by traffic experts, and do exactly what those experts recommend, they might just end up making things worse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braess'_paradox#Traffic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braess'_paradox#Traffic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_wave https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_wave
- justinmc 10y agoDo you have a source for your roadway wear formula? Just interested to read more.
- sampo 10y agoIf you just google something like 'per-axle weight to the fourth power' you find lots of sources.
- logfromblammo 10y agoThe AASHO Road Test is the ultimate source for the 4th power rule. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AASHO_Road_Test https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AASHO_Road_Test