4 ms·
Which city is doing LRT? These can be more cost-effective in the long run at certain ridership levels, plus they're usually a better experience for the passenge
by astrodust 10y ago
Which city is doing LRT? These can be more cost-effective in the long run at certain ridership levels, plus they're usually a better experience for the passenger.
Busses just plain suck.
- sanswork 10y agohttp://www.metrolinx.com/en/projectsandprograms/transitexpansionprojects/toronto_lrt.aspx http://www.metrolinx.com/en/projectsandprograms/transitexpan...
- illumin8 10y agoSalt Lake City, Utah, has had very good success with light rail.
- photojosh 10y agoSydney is doing them, and it seems okay. Newcastle is doing a 4km line...
- jpatokal 10y agoGiven the mention of "small city", I presume this is referring to Canberra: https://www.transport.act.gov.au/light-rail-project https://www.transport.act.gov.au/light-rail-project I don't think it's a bad idea as such, particularly if you consider it planning ahead for projected growth, but there are a lot of much larger cities in Australia that could use the same money more usefully. Building a BRT in Canberra now would be kind of pointless, since traffic jams are essentially non-existent, making ordinary buses rapid enough already.
- jakecopp 10y agoWhen I lived in Canberra a year ago I noticed some backed up traffic in peak time near EPIC - however I realised there was only one car lane in each direction, and one bus lane in each direction. I don't agree that we should always build more roads if there is traffic, but building a light rail solution when the bottleneck is one congested car lane each way seems a bit unusual.
- NamTaf 10y agoIt could well be the Gold Coast, too, which has just finished its light rail in preparation for the Commonwealth Games next year.