4 ms·
I've already head this conversation at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1377077 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1377077 about Moose. Moose is good, but i
by sreque 16y ago
I've already head this conversation at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1377077 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1377077 about Moose. Moose is good, but it's not that good, and certainly not nearly enough to make up for the terrible language underpinning it.
- jrockway 16y agoWhat language is not terrible?
- alnayyir 16y agoJ Scourges weakling humans, lets me write code like a stack of paperclips.
- forkandwait 16y agoOMG!!! I actually maintain J code!! There are, like, 10 of us in the whole universe. I think more people speak Quileute than still use J (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quileute_language http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quileute_language)... for good reason ...
- draegtun 16y agoMoose is good, but it's not that good I think its "good enough" to tempt people to use Perl.
- berntb 16y agoSince you don't seem to consider the best OO system around a part of the language, I assume you are a functional fanatic?