I don't think the marketing concept of non-technical programing makes sense. Its like trying to sell atonal arrhythmic music. Or randomization as an interior

I don't think the marketing concept of non-technical programing makes sense. Its like trying to sell atonal arrhythmic music. Or randomization as an interior design strategy. You've already embedded learning in the design where the user has to understand its Subject-Verb not Verb-Subject. Also my experience with OO design is non-technical non-logical people will have truly weird arguments trying to convince you that your objects should be methods and vice versa due to lack of skill at being able to design. By analogy someone who knows how, can always convert a PDA to a CFG, its mathematically proven if you know how you can always do the transform or even write a program (compiler?) to do the transform for you in either direction. But if you don't know how it works or what any of that automata theory jargon means, well, then you just can't, thats it, game over. Likewise your end user can either program at some level, where they can convert culture and emotions and brain waves and other stuff into code, or they can't. And if they can't, well, they just can't. I'd suggest you market it as a really simple programming language. That'll work. What you've got technically looks good an sounds like it could be useful, so, cool, but you just need to change how you're selling it. Realize that people who can't logically structure and rationally think and technically design will continue to be unable to program, of course, no matter how easy the tool is to use. Remember most people are functionally illiterate and can't read at a high cognitive level. That probably correlates very strongly with being unable to program BTW. (edited to add, this was the wisdom of the GUI. Plenty of people are too illiterate and non-technical to ever be able to use languages, including even English prose, as a computer UI. But if you strip out most of the functionality and change it from linguistic IQ skill points to 2-D spatial manipulation, lots more people can "use" that UI... Nobody ever got noobs to use computers via every "simpler" and dumber CLIs, that madness leads to CPM and msdos, the trick was to get lower intellectual functioning people to use computers by taking away power/complexity and abandoning language and literacy entirely by going spatial with GUIs, I'm just saying as a strategy making the tool weaker never helped people who can't use tools as a historical strategy)