I have to disagree with the author's premise. Just because the majority of Wikipedia editor's are male, this doesn't inherently mean the system will be biased.

I have to disagree with the author's premise. Just because the majority of Wikipedia editor's are male, this doesn't inherently mean the system will be biased. The writer points out that many editors are not university educated like this means that their edits are of less worth than those with a degree. That's laughable. To summarize: more FUD aimed at Wikipedia.