6 ms·
Just to be clear, my assumption was the jurisdiction was US federal law, the entity deleting the data was an individual, the data was their data, and the system
by saycheese 10y ago
Just to be clear, my assumption was the jurisdiction was US federal law, the entity deleting the data was an individual, the data was their data, and the systems deleting the data were owned by them; this based on the context as I understood it provided by the comment I replied to of this thread.
As such, would you please explain why you provide a timeframe for keeping the data prior to deleting it?
- scotch_drinker 10y agoI think he's saying "If you have a policy of deleting your data older than X, you are OK." You have to be able to prove that well before being asked for the data, you had a policy that resulted in it being deleted. Where I work, we delete emails older than 6 months as a company policy. I have to assume this is done for exactly this reason. Don't ask why we might want to do that, I'm not in charge. :-)
- rayiner 10y agoRight. It's about insulating yourself from the accusation that you deleted that data to cover up wrongdoing, rather than for other reasons.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]