4 ms·
But how long before lack of consent is considered incriminating? There are also many different jurisdictions which don't have 5th amendment style protections.
by gjjrfcbugxbhf 10y ago
But how long before lack of consent is considered incriminating?
There are also many different jurisdictions which don't have 5th amendment style protections.
- cmdrfred 10y agoWouldn't a jurisdiction without 5th amendment protections be unconstitutional?
- d3ckard 10y agoWe do not all live in the USA.
- cmdrfred 10y agoThis case does though and considering its a 5th amendment case I'm not sure how it would be relevant internationally.
- jMyles 10y agoThe basis premises (privacy amidst a sea of devices which record at various times and save these recordings off-site) are universal.
- davrosthedalek 10y agoMost jurisdictions have similar provisions. If not, the defendant is screwed anyway.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- adrianN 10y agoDepends on the constitution.
- IncRnd 10y agoIt will be a long time in the jurisdiction of this case before constitutional protection against self-incrimination is stripped.
- obstinate 10y agoThat protection has mostly gotten stronger over the past 200+ years, so I think you're probably right.
- Starwatcher2001 10y agoIn the UK, we have the right to remain silent when questioned by a police officer. But in 1994, the wording was changed to include: "You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence_in_England_and_Wales#Adverse_inferences_from_silence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence_in_England_an...