While it is a legitimate claim to ask for more accessibility, this crab mentality ("if I can't have it neither can you") is not in the best interest of humanity

While it is a legitimate claim to ask for more accessibility, this crab mentality ("if I can't have it neither can you") is not in the best interest of humanity. There are many types of disability and to produce content that is fully inclusive is almost impossible. You have hearing problems, various types of vision problems including color blindness... you can have extreme cases where someone is deaf-blind and also has no hands therefore braille doesn't work. Can that person deny content to everyone else by suing and force everyone to adapt to their needs? Can you possibly cover each individual disability? This sets a precedent that invites other universities to also take down all their content, basically wasting a lot of excellent, valuable hard work.