4 ms·
I would argue that: 1) Zenefits having software tools to specifically skirt state laws about employee certification requirements 2) Theranos lying about clini
by mikekij 10y ago
I would argue that:
1) Zenefits having software tools to specifically skirt state laws about employee certification requirements
2) Theranos lying about clinical results
3) Nant misrepresenting order data to their shareholders
4) Uber having a set of formalized HR processes that facilitate the sexual harassment of female employees
all go beyond "naughty". Plus, I don't think that PG would be excited about the financial impacts that each of those behaviors have had on the respective companies' share prices if he were a shareholder in those companies.
- burkaman 10y agoI think the issue is "they delight in breaking rules". Why delight in it? There's a big difference between "I'm willing to break minor rules when I have to" and "I enjoy being naughty for its own sake". I suspect its a lot easier to break big rules when you're having fun breaking small ones.
- xapata 10y ago> I suspect its a lot easier to break big rules when you're having fun breaking small ones. That sounds plausible, but I suspect the correlation is very weak. Most people follow rules in a bizarrely idiosyncratic and context-sensitive fashion. For example, taking the escalator when going to the gym to use the stair-master.
- iopq 10y agoMost people don't bat an eye about crossing in the middle of a small street. It's technically against the law, but hey.
- gpawl 10y agoThe advice is equivalent to "we want your break the rules, but don't get caught". It's encouraging misbehavior while trying to distance from the consequences.
- komali2 10y agoI think with Uber the "naughty" could be more that they'd set up shop in countries without e-taxi regulation set up, skirt around taxi laws, and become too big and valued by the community before the government would have time to react.
- vecinu 10y ago> 4) Uber having a set of formalized HR processes that facilitate the sexual harassment of female employees Is this publicly available information? First time I hear of it.
- gozur88 10y agoYou're overstating the case on #4.
- dnautics 10y agoAgreed. Would you accept: uber having a set of informal HR processes that fail to protect employees from persistent harassment
- dublidu 10y agoI really don't understand why Zenefit's script was such a big deal. Have you ever had to sit through a bunch of slides and be forced to spend x hours staring at something you can speed read through in minutes? The regulations didn't care about testing real knowledge, just time spent on the module. Anyone with a slight bit of naughtiness will hack around this.