> Maybe algebraic data types would be more suitable. There is no opposition between ADT and generics. In fact most language that have ADT have generics… > In

> Maybe algebraic data types would be more suitable. There is no opposition between ADT and generics. In fact most language that have ADT have generics… > In Go, you don't have subclassing, so you cannot implement YourClass<T extends SomeAncestor>. There is no link between generics and inheritence, functionnal languages usually don't have OOP mechanism but they still have generics.