I believe the GP was trying to point out that the visa suspension was targeted at forms of travel other than immigration. I believe the logic is that immigratio

I believe the GP was trying to point out that the visa suspension was targeted at forms of travel other than immigration. I believe the logic is that immigration requirements are already strict enough, but procedures to get a travel visa needed to be strengthened/reviewed. I point this out strictly as a response to your reading of the GP's post, not as support of the travel ban.