People have a right to their opinion, and people have a right to oppose other's opinions. I question whether people have a right to continue to argue about such

People have a right to their opinion, and people have a right to oppose other's opinions. I question whether people have a right to continue to argue about such an opinion in a way that spreads virally, however. One good technique for spreading irrationality virally is to ask leading questions which continue the "debate" about something that really isn't that important. We have programming languages, they are often times hard to learn, and learning new ones, or making new ones, is something only a subset of the programming aggregate can and are willing to do. i.e. It's an important topic for a few, but for the rest of humanity, it really doesn't matter that much day to day. (Which is not to say a new language might eventually be useful to all, but that argument itself is irrational given it may occur in the future.) I'm only calling out this argument here because I find this general viral behavior is occurring around other concepts in a way that is creating inefficiencies in communication channels - something we didn't really intend when building the Internet.