I suspect the two pragmatic points to take away are: > Many of Oleson’s respondents discussed the alienating effects of their high intelligence; social maladju

I suspect the two pragmatic points to take away are: > Many of Oleson’s respondents discussed the alienating effects of their high intelligence; social maladjustment could be a possible explanation for their elevated crime rates. > Another issue is that the bulk of his gifted cohort was recruited from a private high-IQ society, and people who join such clubs might not represent highly intelligent people in general. To that last point, this has the same vague smell of the kind of study whose participants were from the college it was sponsored by and so as he says it should be taken as preliminary and I'd add with a large grain of salt.