3 ms·
I agree with you, that sci-hub isn't a solution, but what you suggest isn't a solution either. The research must become more open, better reviewed, etc. But we
by EvgeniyZh 10y ago
I agree with you, that sci-hub isn't a solution, but what you suggest isn't a solution either.
The research must become more open, better reviewed, etc. But we can't just stop submitting our work.
- tmalsburg2 10y agoNo one suggested that we stop publishing. Instead we have to publish in open access journals, even if these don't give us as much prestige as the established science tabloids (as Andrew Gelman calls them). Either that or we stop whining about the evil publishers. They are only as evil as we allow them to be.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- EvgeniyZh 10y agoBasically, if part of the scientists (you don't expect everyone to do that, do you?) will stop to publish in prestige journals, and the other part will, who do you think will have more research opportunities, grants, collaborations, etc.? I mean are you ready to decrease an impact of your discovery and opportunities for future work, just to make a statement?