Should've waited for the DNA evidence. The idea we convict with just eyewitness testimony alone is enough of a nightmare. Also, this is how it happens already

Should've waited for the DNA evidence. The idea we convict with just eyewitness testimony alone is enough of a nightmare. Also, this is how it happens already if they go through the entire trial. * "We have an eyewitness. File the charges!" * "Jury finds the defendant not guilty because they didn't think the eyewitness' testimony was proof beyond a reasonable doubt." * "We found DNA evidence and even a video that someone recorded but didn't admit to just now." Double jeopardy means they can't go ahead, no matter what evidence they find. This is just extending that a little further, which I see as a good thing.