I think Greenwald is trying, in his way, to build opposition to another Hillary candidacy in 2020. I think he's saying that she's dangerously hawkish and that

I think Greenwald is trying, in his way, to build opposition to another Hillary candidacy in 2020. I think he's saying that she's dangerously hawkish and that Russia's apparent hand in her defeat is leading Democrats in general to be too hawkish as well. The last point is, to my mind, the most important: if Dems want to retake the White House in 2020, they're better served by building momentum locally and finding a better candidate than by hand-wringing about Russian interference.