3 ms·
>I've seen first hand the horrendous amount of corrosion which can hide in a 50 year old aeroplane and not be found until the wings are removed. If it's such a
by cpncrunch 10y ago
>I've seen first hand the horrendous amount of corrosion which can hide in a 50 year old aeroplane and not be found until the wings are removed.
If it's such a problem, how come there hasn't been a single case of a in-flight structural failure from corrosion of any strut-braced Cessna? In fact there have only been two cases of structural failure in 172s, both of which appear to have been caused by trying to do aerobatics:
https://www.ntsb.gov/about/employment/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/brief.aspx?ev_id=20030123X00096&key=1 https://www.ntsb.gov/about/employment/_layouts/ntsb.aviation...
http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=45260 http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=45260
- phillc73 10y agoIt could be that the SIDS inspections are in place to prevent catastrophic structural failures. One single edition of Flight Safety Australia in 2015 lists five reports of corrosion in Cessna singles, including specifically relating to the main wing spar. http://www.flightsafetyaustralia.com/2015/06/24-march-20-may-2015-7/ http://www.flightsafetyaustralia.com/2015/06/24-march-20-may...