AirBnB makes it worse for the local population, that's what this 60% thing is about. Sure it's great as a tourist but as an owner, when you could rent your pla

AirBnB makes it worse for the local population, that's what this 60% thing is about. Sure it's great as a tourist but as an owner, when you could rent your place for X € a month, on AirBnB you could probably rent it for 70% of that for a week. Bottom line is you're not looking for people to rent it all year long, now you want to make a quick buck and rent it on AirBnB. There's an article in the HuffPost: http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2016/03/30/airbnb-paris-location-rentable-loyer-appartement-logement-hotel_n_9572252.html http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2016/03/30/airbnb-paris-locatio... "In the 10 most touristy areas, 9 to 10 nights on AirBnB cover a whole month of 'regular' rent". To get there, they analyzed 8000 places out of 35000 (studios and one bedroom).