3 ms·
I would argue it with irrationality, which is the point here. Science can't be used inside a frame of reference to refer to something outside that frame without
by kordless 10y ago
I would argue it with irrationality, which is the point here. Science can't be used inside a frame of reference to refer to something outside that frame without being irrational. The point the scientific principle becomes irrational is the point people start demanding an explanation.
I would also say that it is possible we are all missing the point.
- ThomPete 10y agoWhat is outside the frame of reference? QM isn't outside the frame of reference of the scientific method though. It's as proven mathematically and empirically as general relativity is. So the only irrational thing here would be to claim that the quantum world isn't as real as the classical physical world. Agree on the last part though. we might (are most likely) all be missing the point