> It's offloading the cost of hiring on to prospective candidates. Why is that a bad thing? The prospective candidates aren't entitled to anything, the burden

> It's offloading the cost of hiring on to prospective candidates. Why is that a bad thing? The prospective candidates aren't entitled to anything, the burden should be on them to prove they have any capabilities for the job. > What is the employer putting up? Generally nothing. Totally incorrect, have you ever had to hire somebody? The initial phone screens alone to weed out the 99% of complete incompetents takes many hours/days. Even getting to the list of phone screens, involves many hours of sifting through resumes, where each resume is cleverly designed to hide the fact that the prospective candidate is incompetent.