3 ms·
Yes, I agree, but later in the article they show that if the second and 10 is due to a run on first down, they are more likely to run on second down than if the
by WillPostForFood 10y ago
Yes, I agree, but later in the article they show that if the second and 10 is due to a run on first down, they are more likely to run on second down than if they passed on first down. I.e., the coaches are looking backwards not forwards when they make the decision.
- tossaway1 10y ago> they show that if the second and 10 is due to a run on first down, they are more likely to run on second down than if they passed on first down I think you got this backwards. If the first down was a run, they were far less likely to run on second down compared to when the first down was a pass.