I agree it's hard. It's also very valuable. Your example works for my idea too. If you are the source for "The Minnesota checkered sky theory" then the buck st

I agree it's hard. It's also very valuable. Your example works for my idea too. If you are the source for "The Minnesota checkered sky theory" then the buck stops with you and an investigation of your credibility would be damaged. I mean 'you' in the rhetorical sense of course. The thing I'm talking about is something like a reputation score for news sources.