> If you want to be so general, then anything can be considered mathematics that was where this whole conversation started, 'what is reality[anything]?' you a

> If you want to be so general, then anything can be considered mathematics that was where this whole conversation started, 'what is reality[anything]?' you are working from an incomplete definition of the full scale of, even recognised, mathematics which is clear in that you define it as being 'built on top of axiomatic set theory' when godel used mathematics to show axioms are limited in scope but you, stead Godel, consider that all of mathematics, and now I'm repeating myself