3 ms·
Using total employment rate (16-64) is disingenuous. Much of the drop is more people going to university, or just finishing high school before working. For wome
by TorKlingberg 10y ago
Using total employment rate (16-64) is disingenuous. Much of the drop is more people going to university, or just finishing high school before working. For women that effect is hidden by the decline in homemakers.
- peter303 10y agoTrump said recently as last week that all non-employed people in this age group are unemployed. That number is 41% in US. Note this includes all the women-folk in Trumps family- four housewives and a student.