> Actually Java has always been a fairly dynamic language. If it wasn't you wouldn't have all the XML and annotation stuff but code generation like you do in C/

> Actually Java has always been a fairly dynamic language. If it wasn't you wouldn't have all the XML and annotation stuff but code generation like you do in C/C++ and to some extent Go. You're equivocating on "dynamic". Java is not a dynamically typed language. It can be seen as "dynamic" in the sense that its behavior can be modified at runtime by external files. Then again, what languages can't?