3 ms·
The play framework sounds like something you'd be interested in. It abandons the Java conventions for a more rails like experience. http://www.playframework.or
by silkodyssey 16y ago
The play framework sounds like something you'd be interested in. It abandons the Java conventions for a more rails like experience.
http://www.playframework.org/ http://www.playframework.org/
- mnml_ 16y agoplayframework is way better than rails in my opinion
- sandGorgon 16y agoNo comments about the Lift framework ? FourSquare uses it
- buddycasino 16y agoWatched the screencast. First thought when I saw 'SomeClass extends Controller': this will be hard to evolve. Tapestry 5 has done away with this and does not require interfaces or superclasses anymore in order to avoid breaking the API in future releases, they should have learned from that.
- anatari 16y agoYeah, never heard of it until now. If I ever venture out into Java land again, I'll have to give it a better look. How does it compare to Grails?
- silkodyssey 16y agoI've never looked at grails so I can't offer an opinion but I have some links that may be helpful to you. The first is a HN discussion on the play framework and the second a discussion on google groups about the differences between the two frameworks. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=898738 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=898738 http://groups.google.com/group/play-framework/browse_thread/thread/24aab4dcc64d95f3 http://groups.google.com/group/play-framework/browse_thread/...
- runevault 16y agoYou can use Play! with scala as well, so you get a good framework AND a more interesting language at the same time ;)