Same. A lot of weather sites just pull the free NWS data and wrap it in ads. Some use higher-resolution grids or better models (check http://forecastadvisor.c

Same. A lot of weather sites just pull the free NWS data and wrap it in ads. Some use higher-resolution grids or better models (check http://forecastadvisor.com/ http://forecastadvisor.com/ for your area), but they're almost always at least based on the free NWS data. Also, only weather.gov lets you click around on a map to get their model results for any square on the grid, not just towns and cities. What is wrong with these people?! EDIT: Weird. "Its satellite data division would lose $513 million, or 22 percent, of its current funding under the proposal... National Weather Service would be fortunate by comparison, facing only 5 percent cuts." I doubt slashing the satellite budget would improve forecasts, which tend to rely upon data.