2 ms·
Bloomberg and WSJ seem to have avoided 1->2 aor 2->3. Note that public media companies are relatively new, and their biggest problem is Craigslist, which is de
by anamax 16y ago
Bloomberg and WSJ seem to have avoided 1->2 aor 2->3.
Note that public media companies are relatively new, and their biggest problem is Craigslist, which is deliberately not maximizing revenue. (CL isn't public, so it isn't legally obligated to do so and Newmark has control.)
Also, the "fact" that incumbents will tend to leave a niche does not imply that new players won't enter. As a result, the niche can stay filled even though the occupants leave.
- DenisM 16y agoYes, it's not impossible to slow down the process. I'm not reading either of the two papers you mentioned, but I used to read another serious paper - Harvard Business Review, and they were producing 50% fluff plus 50% great reading material. I recon that's their deal with the devil, and not a bad one. However I am strongly convinced that it rests solely on integrity of the old-school journalists and once they retire so will the relevant news.