4 ms·

I ... I can't tell if he's serious ...

• smokinn 16y ago
  He is. I've seen him do it.
• tjr 16y ago
  I suspect he is. In every email conversation I've had with him since 1998, I get this auto-reply (or something like it; it has likely morphed somewhat over the years): I am not on vacation, but I am at the end of a long time delay. I am located somewhere on Earth, but as far as responding to email is concerned, I appear to be well outside the solar system. After your message arrives at gnu.org, I will collect it in my next batch of incoming mail, some time within the following 24 hours. I will spend much of the following day reading that batch of mail and will come across your message at some point. If I can write a response for it immediately, the response will go out in the next outgoing batch--typically around 24 hours after I collected your message, but occasionally sooner or later than that. As a result, you should expect a minimum delay of between 24 and 48 hours in seeing any response to your mail to me. If you are having a conversation with me, please keep in mind that each message you receive from me is probably a response to the mail you sent 24 to 48 hours earlier, and any subsequent mail you sent has not yet been seen by me.
  • zephjc 16y ago
    Might as well just write by post
    • tomhogans 16y ago
      Not feasible. The software used in the mail sorting machines is not open source.
      • w1ntermute 16y ago
        Neither is a lot of the software used by the network hardware of the internet's backbone, but that hasn't stopped RMS from using the internet.
  • mkramlich 16y ago
    sounds like he's using the TCP/pigeon protocol