4 ms·
Sure, but the follow-up systems would be worse. I haven't seen a single actual improvement in software in 10 years. It's all churn and bloat.
by 192837821912 10y ago
Sure, but the follow-up systems would be worse. I haven't seen a single actual improvement in software in 10 years.
It's all churn and bloat.
- cderwin 10y agoThere is good and bad, but you certainly must be blind if you think the progress of technology has been relatively stagnant since the introduction of unix. Just a couple things that come to mind: * The internet (early 90s) * Wireless networking (early 2000s) * Highly portable, small, and lightweight computers (early 2010s) and all the software that supports them. These "follow-up systems" are certainnly better than their predecessors, and there are literally countless more examples (no, everything shouldn't be written in asm and c).
- joshmarlow 10y agoThose are all new(ish) applications for software; the underlying software can still suck even if being used in revolutionary new applications (which I think is more what the grandparent meant).