5 ms·
I wouldn't take Taboo as a historic account of what the east india company did. It's entertainment and not meant to be factually correct. http://www.telegraph.
by jontro 10y ago
I wouldn't take Taboo as a historic account of what the east india company did. It's entertainment and not meant to be factually correct.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10743407/BBC-to-break-Taboo-with-inaccurate-portrayal-of-East-India-Company.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10743407/B...
- linuxkerneldev 10y agoI agree, I didn't intend to imply that it was in anyway historically accurate. However, it does communicate some of how the EIC operated at that time.