4 ms·
I find myself frustrated by Ubuntu's packaging system. I really like Arch Linux, because I can do pacman -S ruby, and I have everything I need. Including a work
by cschep 16y ago
I find myself frustrated by Ubuntu's packaging system. I really like Arch Linux, because I can do pacman -S ruby, and I have everything I need. Including a working Ruby Gems that I can use to update itself. And a copy of the latest Ruby 1.9, without having to change symlinks, etc.
I find myself hating the fact that I have to configure everything manually though, I don't mind using Gnome, or KDE, I just really like pacman. Configuring fonts it's just not my idea of fun. Is there any chance that I would be more satisfied with Fedora's packaging? I'm going to throw it in a virtualbox to check it out, just wondering if anyone has had a similar experience?
- k33n 16y agoYum is pretty nice. You'd probably enjoy it. yum install ruby gives you everything you need.
- psadauskas 16y agoUnless you need a gem that needs the ruby header files. Then you have to remember to always install -dev for everything, mysql, postgres, libxml, etc...
- k33n 16y agoTrue. I never found that to be much of a hassle myself though.