3 ms·
I think what's getting lost in this discussion is that Affirmative Action isn't a trigger for "hire a woman over the more qualified man". All it mandates is th
by true_religion 10y ago
I think what's getting lost in this discussion is that Affirmative Action isn't a trigger for "hire a woman over the more qualified man".
All it mandates is that if on paper two candidates are equal scores, your process should pick the female/minority candidate. Historically, if you left it up to people in the organisation they'd go with their "gut" feelings and pick whomever was of a similar background to them.
If two candidates aren't equal, you always pick the better candidate.
- discombobulate 10y agoThat's mandated discrimination.
- selllikesybok 10y agoNot in the sense of the word that you seem likely to be using, no.
- discombobulate 10y agoI checked the definition of the words before I posted. Please, enlighten me?