3 ms·
I'll have to disagree on a few of the points on that list: > - relative multi-threaded performance per $ Highly depends on the particular workload. Given the
by keldaris 10y ago
I'll have to disagree on a few of the points on that list:
> - relative multi-threaded performance per $
Highly depends on the particular workload. Given the few benchmarks we have right now, it seems to go 50-50 once you factor in the lower price of the 7700k. At the very least, this one is close.
> - memory bandwidth
Seems about equal from the measurements I've seen (the theoretical numbers are irrelevant).
> - L3-cache bound workloads (AMD has twice more L3)
Cache-size bound workloads to be precise. Cache latency still seems higher, even on L3.
Overall, the 1800X seems to make the entire Broadwell-E series redundant on price/performance (at least at current price), no argument there. Against the 7700k, however, it's a very interesting decision, entirely based on the distribution of your workloads. And if Intel drops the prices on Kaby Lake, the value equation can change very quickly indeed.
- mrb 10y agoRyzen 7 1800X unambiguously beats the 7700k on memory bandwidth: http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1800x_processor_review,13.html http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1800x_proce...
- keldaris 10y agoGuru3D seem to be the only ones to manage memory frequencies over 3 Ghz, most reviewers report a lot of issues with the memory subsystem at the moment. In many reviews (see [1] for a representative example) the 1800X is on par or even slightly behind the 7700k in memory bandwidth, so at the very least the situation is far from unambiguous. [1] https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Processors/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Review-Now-and-Zen/Synthetics-and-Scientific https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Processors/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-R...